Compatible Lenses for 360

A lens that is good for photographic purposes is often not good for scanning purposes. This is because while photographic lenses are made to focus on 3D objects at distances from about 50cm, we are trying to focus on a 2D object at much closer distances. Most photographic lenses will not even focus close enough to fill the digital frame with the film and you would have to crop. Even if it does, or you use extension tubes, this is not enough.

An optimal lens for scanning projects a flat focus field, has high resolution at close focus distances and has high contrast. These are complex concepts, but by looking through the price ranges that you are interested in, you should get a good overview of what will work for you.

General Points

  • Normal photographic lenses are not very suited for scanning
  • Stay away from vintage Zoom (variable focal length) 'Macro' lenses - they are not true macro lenses
  • Using extension tubes on a normal photographic lens will not give very high quality scans
  • Some macro lenses, vintage and modern, are excellent
  • You will find a lot of misinformation about lenses on the Internet and on forums

Lens Recommendations

Note: That the categories you will find below are are ordered in order of price range, not in quality - generally the three last categories can provide similarly good results.

Use What You Have

0-50€

Extension tubes

Automatic extension tubes

Kit-lens

Pros
• Cheap
• Good for testing out

Cons
• Low quality

Read more

 

Vintage Macro Lenses

80-200€

Nikon Nikkor 55mm f2.8

Nikon Nikkor 55mm f3.5

Komine/Vivitar 55mm f2.8

7artisans 60mm f2.8

Olympus Zuiko 50mm f3.5

Canon FD 50mm f3.5

Pros
• More affordable
• Easily adapted
• Wide range of options
• High quality

Cons
• Manual focus
• Variable Optical Quality
• Risk of Defects

Read more

 

Reproduction Lenses

80€ and up

Rodenstock Rodagon Apo (all of them, 50mm, 75mm, 80mm) (expensive)

Schnieder Componar S 50mm f/2.8 (affordable)

Rodenstock Rodagon 50mm f/2.8 (affordable)

Nikon El-Nikkor 50mm f/2.8 (affordable)

80mm equivalents of the 3 above

Pros
• Potentially very high quality
• Special made for the purpose
• Good cost to quality ratio

Cons
• There are poor enlarger lenses
• Hard to adapt - a bit of DIY
• 50mm lenses are not very useable on DSLRs

Read more


Modern Macro

250-800€

Sigma 70mm f2.8 DG Macro

Nikon Nikkor 60mm f2.8 AF-S

Canon 60mm f2.8 Macro

Pros
• Auto-focus - quicker to use
• Modern optics taking advantage of modern production techniques

Cons
• Big jump in price with little or no increase in quality

Read more


FAQ

Should I use an autofocus or manual focus lens?
Using a manual focus lens will typically get you the same results at a much lower price compared to more modern auto-focus lenses. However, it might slow you down because you will want to check your focus between every time you set up or when you change the format, or something else about your scanning setup. Therefore, an autofocus lens can save time, particularly if you scan several formats.

Can I use a normal non-macro lens?
Yes, normal lenses can be used if you have the right length of extension tubes. However, the results can range from acceptable to terrible and we always recommend getting a lens actually designed to focus close. If you want to use normal photographic lenses, you will get the best results by stopping down as far as the lens will go, such as f/16 or f/22.